EFFECT OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER AND THERMAL RADIATION ON A STEADY MHD CONVECTIVE FLOW WITH VISCOUS DISSIPATION AND SUCTION/INJECTION

 

K.K. PANDIT, S. GOSWAMI‡§   and   D. SARMA§

Department of Mathematics, JIST, Jorhat, Assam-785010, India

kamalesh.pandit@yahoo.co.in

Institute of Advanced Study in Science and Technology, Guwahati, Assam, India-781035

gsilpisikha@gmail.com

§ Cotton University, Guwahati, Assam, India-781001

Dipaksarma11@yahoo.com

Cite this article as: 

Pandit, K.K., Goswami, S., Sarma, D. (2022) “Effect of heat and mass transfer and thermal radiation on a steady mhd convective flow with viscous dissipation and suction/injection”, Latin American Applied Research 52(1), pp 35-41.

 


Abstract--Our motive is to examine the impact of thermal radiation and suction or injection with viscous dissipation on an MHD boundary layer flow past a vertical porous stretched sheet immersed in a porous medium. The set of the flow equations is converted into a set of non-linear ordinary differential equations by using similarity transformation. We used MATLAB bv4c technique to solve the set of equations. The impact of non-dimensional physical parameters on flow profiles is analyzed and depicted in graphs. We observe the influence of non-dimensional physical quantities on the Nusselt number, the Sherwood number, and skin friction presented in tables. A comparison of the obtained numerical results with existing results in a limiting sense is also presented. We enhance radiation to observe the deceleration of fluid velocity and temperature profile for both suction and injection. While enhancing porosity parameter accelerates velocity whereas decelerates temperature profile. As the heat source parameter increases, the temperature of the fluid decreases for both suction and injection, it has been found. The skin friction and the heat transfer rate decrease with the increasing values of the radiation parameter. Increasing magnetic parameter decelerates the skin friction, Nusselt number, and Sherwood number.

Keywords--Suction/Injection, Heat and Mass Transfer, Thermal Radiation, MHD, Heat Source, Porous Medium, MATLAB bv4c.

I. INTRODUCTION

Heat and mass transfer through a viscous fluid flow in a porous medium is applicable in various industrial fields such as drying porous solid, enhanced oil recovery, geothermal reservoirs, and several such research areas. Free convective flow and heat transfer through stretching porous medium has an impact on polymer and metallurgy technology. A porous sheet's stretching capacity is responsible for the rate of heat and mass transfer through a viscous and incompressible fluid. Therefore, the flow over a stretching porous sheet has evolved as a vital area of research. Crane (1970) developed the study of flow over stretching sheet focusing on the result that in polymer industries standard of the finishing product depends on the heat and mass transfer rate over a stretching sheet.  Subhas and Veena (1998) studied the flow of heat and visco-elastic fluid over an impermeable stretching sheet inserted in a saturated porous medium. Dogonchi et al. (2018) investigated the Joule heating, and thermal radiation effect in MHD flow of nanofluid over a stretching surface. Ghadikolaei et al. (2018a) approached numerically to observe the flow of non-linear nanofluid passes through a porous stretching sheet. Khan et al. (2019) investigated the Williamson nanofluid flow analytically over a stretchable surface in the presence of Joule heating. Nayaka et al. (2019) observed the mass transfer of an axisymmetric flow through a non-linear radially stretched sheet. Ibrahim and Gadisa (2020) considered a stretching sheet to evaluate the non-linear convection flow of Oldroyd-B fluid. Recently (Manjunatha et al., 2020; Rajasekhar et al., 2020; Vaida et al., 2020; Prasad et al., 2020a; Divya et al., 2021; Vaida et al., 2021), various studies have been conducted on MHD peristaltic flow considering heat and mass transfer in both uniform and non-uniform medium with small variable viscosity.

Suction or injection influences the heat transfer rate in heat and mass transfer of a fluid flow.  Mostly in aerodynamics, suction and injection theory is applied to control the pollution and cost-effectiveness of a commercial aircraft by reducing fuel consumption. Suction and injection at the boundary wall are responsible for the change in the rate of mass and heat transfer. Agarwal and Roy (1979) observed the distinction of stagnation and pressure point for both suction and injection. Jha and Aina (2018) observed the influence of suction or injection on a mixed convection flow in a microchannel. Rehman et al. (2019) studied the combined influence of suction/injection, magnetic field, slippage, and surface tension at the boundary to improve the boundary layer thickness. Recently, Pal and Mandal (2020) scrutinized the combined convective heat and mass flow in the presence of suction and injection.  Prasad et al. (2020b) observed the two-dimensional MHD boundary layer flow through a stretching rotating disk in the presence of suction/injection.

The influence of the radiation parameter on fluid flow significantly impacts conductive gray fluids flow, such as liquid metal fluids, high-temperature plasmas, power generator systems, and nuclear reactors' cooling. Sharma and Konwar (2016) examined the impact of thermal radiation on an MHD flow over a rotating cone. Sarma et al.  (2014) observed the thermal radiation and chemical reaction effect on an unsteady MHD flow over an infinite accelerated vertical plate considering a porous medium. Recently Rajput et al. (2020) examined the magnetohydrodynamics boundary layer flow through an exponentially stretched surface in a porous medium with radiation effect. Kumar et al.(2020) reported the impact of thermal radiation on heat and mass flow over both divergent and convergent channels to conclude that the heat transfer rate is higher in divergent channels than in the convergent channel. Haq et al. (2020) studied the radiation effect on fluid flow over a shrinking surface in the presence of suction and injection. Sarma and Pandit (2015) studied Hall current, rotation, and Soret effects on MHD natural convective combined heat and mass flow over an accelerated vertical plate through a porous medium. Pal and Mandal (2017) analysed the impact of radiation on mixed convective heat and mass flow through a stretching and shrinking sheet at a stagnation point. Ghadikolaei et al. (2018b) studied the effect of thermal radiation and Joule heating on magnetohydrodynamics Casson nano-fluid flow through an inclined porous stretched surface. Khader (2018) developed a numerical formula to express the thin liquid film's flow and heat transfer. Megahed (2019) observed the Carreau flow over a non-linear stretched surface in the presence of thermal radiation. Waini et al. (2020) investigated the flow and heat transfer of hybrid nano-fluid over a stretched or shrunk surface in the presence of a magnetic field and thermal radiation. Pal et al. (2020) examined the heat and mass flow through a stretched surface with thermal radiation.

The works mentioned above depict the importance of studying the influence of thermal radiation on the MHD free and mixed convective heat and mass transfer flow over a porous stretched surface considering suction and injection. In this study, we observed the influence of both suction and injection on a two-dimensional, radiative flow of viscous electrically conducting fluid over a stretching porous surface. Our work is an extension of the work of Jaber (2016), where he observed the influence of Joule heating and viscous dissipation on the exact configuration without the presence of suction and injection. Here we have observed the impact of radiation parameters along with other involved parameters in fluid profiles.

II. MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION

We consider the steady two-dimensional flow of an electrically conducting with viscous and incompressible fluid passes through a porous stretching sheet issuing from a slit at the origin of the rectangular co-ordinates as shown in Fig. 1. The sheet is assumed to be horizontal and coincides with the plate . The plate is continuously stretching by two equal powers with opposite directions. The speed is assumed to be proportional to its distance from the slit point. The flow is considered to be in the -direction which is taken along the plate, see Fig. 1. We have examined the effect of heat generation, suction/in-

Figure 1: Mathematical formulation of the problem.

jection, thermal radiation, and viscous dissipation irrespective of time on the flow field. The plate is subjected to a power law heat flux in presence of heat source. The sheet moves along the -axis with the velocity , where  is the stretching rate considered a positive integrand of the velocity  in the -axis direction. A uniform strong magnetic field of strength  is subjected normal to the plate. This magnetic field generates an electric field for the electrically conducting fluid. We assumed a negligible Reynolds number to overcome the effect of the induced magnetic field. The governing equations Jaber (2016) under boundary layer and Boussinesq’s approximations for flow over the stretching surface embedded in a porous medium are, given below,

Continuity equation:

                          (1)

Equation of Motion:

                   (2)

Equation of Energy:

 

                                        (3)

Equation of Mass-deposition:

            (4)

The boundary conditions are (Kumar, 2009):

 

                      (5)

For an optically thick fluid, in addition to emission, there is also self-absorption, and usually, the absorption coefficient is wavelength dependent and significant, so we can adapt the Rosseland approximation for the radiative heat flux vector . Thus  is given by

                   (6)

We assume that the temperature differences within the flow are sufficiently small so that  can be expressed as a linear function. By using Taylor's series, we expand  about the free stream temperature.  and neglecting higher-order terms. This results in the following approximation:

             (7)

We introduced the similarity transformations as follows,

,

        (8)

After using the similarity transformations, we have:

  (9)

      (10)

                                             (11)

where,

,

M=.

The boundary conditions:

;

                   (12)

 

III. NUMERICAL METHOD OF SOLUTION

The MATLAB built-in bvp4c solver scheme is implemented to solve the resulting coupled Eqs. (9)-(11) along with the boundary condition (12). It is a boundary value problem solver technique and gives the results by employing finite difference code. This technique is already built-in MATLAB and solves the problem by indirectly resolving the error, providing the solutions at each mesh point of the given interval. The user has to offer the following three essential functions to get the results:

(i) Initial (guess) solutions:

This scheme shows promising results with good guess values. Although, by getting low guess values, this scheme also shows the output.

(ii) System of first-order equations:

The resulting Eqs. (9)-(11) can be written in the system of first-order equations by introducing the new variables as follows:

Then, we have achieved the following first-order system of equations

(iii) Relevant boundary conditions:

The boundary conditions 11 (a-b) can be written in the following way:

;

.

IV. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

We solved non-linear differential Eqs. (9)-(11) under boundary conditions (12) using MATLAB built-in bvp4c solver scheme. The influence of the various flow physical parameters on flow profiles is depicted in graphs, and on the skin friction coefficient, local Nusselt and Sherwood numbers are presented in tabular form, respectively. We assumed, so that the fluid becomes equivalent to water.

First, we present the result for variation of the mag

Fig.2.PNG

Figure 2: Velocity profiles for various values of .

Fig.3.PNG

Figure 3: Temperature profiles for various values of .

Fig.4.PNG

Figure 4: Velocity profiles for various values of .

netic parameter.  Figure 2 depicts that an increase in the values of the magnetic parameter reduces the velocity boundary layer for both suction/injection. Since an increase in the magnetic field develops the opposite force to the flow direction, named Lorentz force, it reduces the boundary layer thickness.

      Figure 3 represents the temperature profile for different values of the magnetic parameter. The non-dimensional temperature increases for increasing values of  for both suction and injection. The temperature at a point on the sheet rises significantly with the increase in , i.e., the heat transfer rate decreases with the increasing magnetic parameter .

Figures 4-5 depict the influence of thermal and concentration buoyancy forces on the fluid velocity. From Fig. 4, we can observe the accelerated fluid velocity  for increasing  for both suction and injection. Fig. 5 states that the fluid velocity increases on accelerating. is the ratio of thermal buoyancy force to viscous force, and  is the ratio of concentration buoyancy force to viscous force. This implies a decrease of on accelerating thermal buoyancy force and an increase of  on enhancing the concentration buoyancy force. Here the free convective flow is caused due to thermal and concentration buoyancy forces; that is why thermal buoyancy force

Fig.5.PNG

Figure 5: Velocity profiles for various values of .

Fig.6.PNG

Figure 6: Velocity profiles for various values of .

Fig.7.PNG

Figure 7: Temperature profiles for various values of .

 

reduces the fluid velocity, whereas concentration buoyancy force increases the fluid velocity throughout the boundary layer region.

      Figures 6 and 7 depict the impact of the permeability parameter on fluid velocity and temperature profile, respectively. We observed from Figs. 6 and 7 that the fluid velocity increases on increasing permeability parameter, but the temperature profile decreases for both suction and injection, respectively. From the flow configuration, it is evident that an increase in porosity of the medium assists the flow along the flow direction, causing the fluid velocity to increase due to its orientation through the porous medium.

      Figures 8 and 9 demonstrate the influence of thermal radiation parameter () on fluid velocity and fluid temperature, respectively. It is evident from Figs. 8 and 9 that the thermal radiation leads to a decrease in the fluid velocity and fluid temperature for both suction/injection. Physically, thermal radiation causes a fall in the temperature of the fluid medium and thereby causes a fall in the kinetic energy of the fluid particles. This results in a corresponding decrease in the fluid velocity. Thus, Figs. 8 and 9 are in excellent agreement with the laws of Physics.



Fig.8.PNG

Figure 8: Velocity profiles for various values of .

Fig.9.PNG

Figure 9: Temperature profiles for various values of .

Fig.10.PNG

Figure 10: Temperature profiles for various values of β.

Next, we show the influence of thermal radiation on velocity and temperature profiles.

Figure 10 depicts the variations in temperature profile for multiple values of heat generation/absorption parameter. Temperature profile decreases with increasing heat generation/absorption parameter. Physically, the presence of heat generation/absorption coefficient tends to reduce the fluid temperature. This causes the thermal buoyancy effects to decrease, resulting in a net reduction in the fluid velocity.

The influence of Schmidt number () on concentration profiles are depicted in Figs. 11. It is noticed from Figs. 11 that concentration profiles decrease on increasing the values of . The Schmidt number embodies the ratio of the momentum to the mass diffusivity. The Schmidt number, therefore, quantifies the relative effectiveness of momentum to mass transport by diffusion in the concentration (species) boundary layers. As the Schmidt number increases, the concentration decreases. This causes the concentration buoyancy effects to reduce. This behavior is clear from Figs 11.

 

Fig.11.PNG

Figure 11: Concentration profiles for various values of .

Fig.12.PNG

Figure 12: Concentration profiles for various values of .

Table 1: Variation of  for various values of Magnetic parameter when , , , =0, .

Jaber works ()

Present results

1

2.00007

2.0115

3

2.56155

2.5612

5

3.0

3.0

 

Figure 12 illustrates the effect of permeability of porous medium () on concentration profile. It is perceived from Fig. 12 that concentration profile decreases on increasing permeability parameter.

The magnitude of ,  and  are given in Tables 1-2. We have compared our results with other works reported in the literature (Jaber, 2016) with an excellent agreement, as shown in Table 1. Table 2 is prepared to show the value of ,  and  different values of and . The magnitude of skin friction coefficient increases when  increased. In contrast, it has the reverse effect on the local Nusselt number and the local Sherwood number. The magnitude of skin friction coefficient and the local Nusselt number increases when  is increased. The magnitude of the skin friction coefficient decreases with 's increased value, increasing with 's increased value. The local Nusselt number and the local Sherwood number increase with the increased value of , whereas it decreases with the increased value of . It has also been found that the magnitude of skin friction coefficient decreases with the increased value of porosity parameter . In contrast, the local Nusselt number and the local Sherwood number increase with the increased value of .

Table 1 compares the skin friction of Jaberworks with our present results and obtain a fair agreement.

Table2: depicts the variations in  and  for the different values of physical parameters.

V. CONCLUSION

An investigation of heat and mass transfer and thermal radiation on an MHD boundary layer flow past a vertical porous stretching surface embedded in a porous medium with viscous dissipation and suction/injection is carried out. Closed-form expressions for velocity, temperature, concentration, the skin friction coefficient, the rate of heat transfer expressed as a Nusselt number, and the rate of mass transfer expressed as a Sherwood number are generated from our mathematical model. We observed




Table 2: Numerical Values of ,  and  for various values of flow parameters when ,  and .

1

 

1

 

0.5

 

0.5

 

0.2

 

0.3

 

0.2

-2.9101

-0.7819

-0.9619

3

-3.2361

-0.6984

-0.9613

5

-3.5316

-0.6145

-0.9608

 

1

 

1

 

0.8

 

0.5

 

0.2

 

0.3

 

0.2

-2.9259

-0.8171

 

-0.9619

1.0

-2.9352

-0.8344

1.5

-2.9547

-0.8654

 

1

 

1

 

0.5

 

0.5

 

0.2

 

0.3

0.5

-2.2871

-0.8513

-0.9632

0.8

-2.0992

-0.8690

-0.9637

1.1

-2.0073

-0.8771

-0.9639

 

1

 

1

 

0.5

 

0.5

0.5

 

0.3

 

0.2

-2.8345

-0.7909

-0.9622

0.8

-2.7686

-0.7986

-0.9624

1.1

-2.7102

-0.8053

-0.9626

 

1

 

1

 

0.5

 

0.5

 

0.2

0.5

 

0.2

-2.9207

-0.7806

-0.9619

0.8

-2.9772

-0.7736

-0.9617

1.1

-3.0348

-0.7664

-0.9615

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

0.5

0.5

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

-2.9101

-0.7819

-0.9619

0.8

-3.0662

-0.7586

-0.9595

1.0

-3.1756

-0.7416

-0.9576

-0.5

-2.4585

-0.8438

-0.9654

-0.8

-2.3422

-0.8584

-0.9652

-1.0

-2.2690

-0.8672

-0.9649

 


 

the impact of governing physical parameters on the fluid profiles. Following are the significant results of our work:

1.       Increasing the magnetic field and the thermal radiation parameter leads to deceleration of the fluid velocity, but the effect is reversed for the permeability parameter.

2.       The fluid temperature and the thermal boundary layer thickness decrease for increasing thermal radiation, permeability parameter, and heat source, whereas reverse effect occurs for the magnetic field parameter.

3.       There is an enhancement in species concentration due to the increase of Schmidt number.

4.       Thermal radiation tends to enhance skin friction and the rate of heat transfer.

5.       The thermal Grashoff number and the porosity parameter decrease skin friction, whereas it has reverse effects on heat and mass transfer rate.

6.       Grashoff number for mass transfer enhances the magnitude of the skin friction, whereas it has reverse effects on the rate of heat and mass transfer.

NOMENCLATURE

     Volumetric thermal expansion coefficient.

     Volumetric coefficient of expansion with specific concentration.

       Heat source parameter.

       Viscosity.

       Kinematic viscosity.

       Density.

       Electrical conductivity.

     Stefan–Boltzmann constant.

     Magnetic field.

       Stretching rate.

     Specific heat at constant pressure.

      Molecular diffusivity coefficient.

    Ekcert number.

   Solutal Grashoff number.

    Thermal Grashoff number.

      Porosity parameter.

       Thermal conductivity.

     Rosseland mean absorption coefficient.

     Hartmann number.

     Prandtl number.

      Heat source parameter.

     Radiative heat flux vector.

      Radiation parameter.

     Schmidt number.

       Suction/injection parameter.

REFERENCES

Agarwal, J.P. and Roy, S.K. (1979) Effect of suction and injection on flow along a vertical plane surface. Appl. Sci. Res. 35, 373-391.

Crane, L.J. (1970) Flow past a stretching plate.Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 21, 645–647.

Divya, B.B., Manjunatha, G., Rajashekhar, C., Vaidya. H. and Prasad, K.V. (2021) Analysis of temperature dependent properties of a peristaltic MHD flowin a non-uniform channel: A Casson fluid model. Ain Shams Eng. J. 12, 2181–2191.

Dogonchi, A.S. and Ganji, D.D. (2018) Effect of cattaneo christov heat flux on buoyancy MHD nano fluid flow and heat transfer over a stretching sheet in the presence of joule heating and thermal radiation impacts. Indian J. Phys. 92, 757-766.

Ghadikolaei, S.S., Hosseinzadeh, Kh., Ganjb, D.D., and Jafari, B. (2018a) Non-linear thermal radiation effect on magneto Casson nanofluid flow with Joule heating effect over an inclined porous stretching sheet. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 12, 176-187.

Ghadikolaeia, S.S., Hosseinzadehb, Kh. and Jafari, B. (2018b) Free convective heat and mass transfer for MHD fluid flow over a permeable vertical stretching sheet in the presence of the radiation and buoyancy effects. Ain Shams Eng. J. 5, 176-187.

Haq, R.U., Razab, A., Algehyne, E. and Tlili, I. (2020) Dual nature study of convective heat transfer of nanofluid flow over a shrinking surface in a porous medium. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 114, 104583.

Ibrahim, W. and Gadisa, G. (2020) Finite element solution of non-linear convective flow of Oldroyd-B fluid with Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model over non-linear stretching sheet with heat generation or absorption. Propuls. Power Res. 9, 304-315.

Jaber, K.K. (2016) Joule heating and viscous dissipation on effects on MHD flow over a stretching porous sheet subjected to power law heat flux in presence of heat source. Open J. Fluid Dyn. 6, 156-165.

Jha, B.K. and Aina, B. (2018) Role of suction/injection on steady fully developedmixed convection flow in a vertical parallel plate microchannel. Ain Shams Eng. J. 9, 947-755.

Khader, M.M. (2018) Approximate solutions for the problem of liquid film flow over an unsteady stretching sheet with thermal radiation and magnetic field.  Appl. Math. Mech. Engl. Ed. 36, 867-876.

Khan, T.H.M.I., Qayyum, S. and Alsaedi, A. (2019) Entropy optimization in flow of williamson nano fluid in the presence of chemical reaction and joule heating. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 133, 901-912.

Kumar, H. (2009) Radiative heat transfer withhydromagnetic flow andviscous dissipation over a stretching surface in thepresence of variable heat flux. Therm Sci. 13, 163-169.

Kumar, K.G., Gorji, M.R., Reddy, M.G., Chamkha, A.J. and Alarifi, I.M. (2020) Enhancement of heat transfer in a convergent/divergent channel by using carbon nanotubes in the presence of a Darcy–Forchheimer medium. Microsyst. Technol. l, 323-332.

Manjunatha, G., Rajashekhar, C., Vaidya. H., Prasad, K. V., Makinde, O.D. and Viharika J.U. (2020) Impact of Variable Transport Properties and Slip Effects on MHD Jeffrey Fluid Flow Through Channel. AJSE. 45, 417-428.

Megahed, A.M. (2019) Carreau fluid flow due to nonlinearly stretching sheet with thermal radiation, heat flux, and variable conductivity. Appl. Math. Mech. Engl. Ed. 40, 1615-1624.

Nayaka, B., Mishraa, S.R. and Gopi Krishna, G. (2019) Chemical reaction effect of an axisymmetric flow over radially stretched sheet. Propuls. Power Res. 8, 79-84.

Pal, D, Chatterjee, D., and Vajravelu, K. (2020) Influence of magneto-thermo radiation on heat transfer of a thin nanofluid film with non-uniform heat source/sink. Propuls. Power Res. 9, 169-180.

Pal, D. and Mandal, G. (2017) Double diffusive magnetohydrodynamic heat and mass transfer of nanofluids over a non-linear stretching/shrinking sheet with viscous-Ohmic dissipation and thermal radiation. Propuls. Power Res. 6, 58-69.

Pal, D. and Mandal, G. (2020) Magnetohydrodynamic stagnation-point flow of Sisko nanofluid over a stretching sheet with suction. Propuls. Power Res. 9, 408-422.

Prasad, K.V., Vaidya, H., Makinde, O.D., Vajravelu, K and Ramajini, V. (2020a) Impact of suction/ injection and heat transfer on unsteady mhd flow over a stretchable rotating disk. Lat. Am. Appl. Res. 50, 159-165.

Prasad, K.V., Vaidya, H., Rajasekhar, C, Khan, S.U., Manjunatha, G. and Viharika, J.U. (2020b) Slip flow of MHD Casson fluid in an inclined channel with variable transport properties. Commun. Theor. Phys. 72.

Rajasekhar, C, Manjunath, D, Vaidya, H., Divya, B.B., Saraswati, J. and Prasad, K.V. (2020) Analysis of peristaltic flow of rabinowitsch fluid in a non-uniform channel: analytical approach. Lat. Am. Appl. Res. 50, 151-158.

Rajput, G.R., Jadhav, B.P. and Salunkhe, S.N. (2020) Magnetohydrodynamics boundary layer flow and heat transfer in porous medium past an exponentially stretching sheet under the influence of radiation. Heat Transfer. 49, 2906-2920.

Rehman, S., Idrees, M., Shah, R.A. and Khan, Z. (2019) Suction/injection effects on an unsteady MHD Casson thin film flow with slip and uniform thickness over a stretching sheetalong variable flow properties. Bound. Value Probl. 2019, 26.

Sarma, D., Ahmed, N. and Deka, H. (2014) MHD free convection and mass transfer flow past an accelerated vertical plate with chemical reaction in presence of radiation. Lat. Am. Appl. Res. 44, 1-8.

Sarma, D. and Pandit, K.K. (2015) Effects of Hall current, rotation and Soret effects on MHD free convection heat and mass transfer flow past an accelerated vertical plate through a porous medium. Ain Shams Eng. J. 9, 631-646.

Sharma B.R. and Konwar, H. (2016) MHD flow, heat and mass transfer about a permeable rotating vertical cone in presence of radiation, chemical reaction and heat generation or absorption effects. Lat. Am. Appl. Res. 46, 109-114.

Subhas, A. and Veena, P. (1998) Visco-elastic fluid flow and heat transfer in a porous medium over a stretching sheet. Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 33, 533-540.

Vaidya, H., Rajashekhar, C., Manjunatha, G., Prasad, K.V., Makinde, O.D. and Vajravelu K. (2020) Heat and mass transfer analysis of MHD peristaltic flow through a complaint porouschannel with variable thermal conductivity. Phys. Scr. 95, 045219.

Vaidya. H., Rajashekhar, C., Prasad, K.V., Khan, S.U., Riaz, A. and Viharika, J.U. (2021) MHD peristaltic flow of nanofluid in a vertical channel with multiple slip features: an application to chyme movement. Biomech model Mechanobiol, 20, 1047–1067.

Waini, I., Ishak, A. and Pop, I. (2020) MHD flow and heat transfer of a hybrid nanofluid past a permeable stretching/shrinking wedge. Appl. Math. Mech. Engl. Ed. 41, 507-520.

 

Received: March 12, 2021

Sent to Subject Editor: April 14, 2021

Accepted: August 16, 2021

Recommended by Subject Editor Gianfranco Caruso