DRYING, COLOUR AND REHYDRATION CHARACTERISTICS
OF ORANGE SLICES UNDER INFRARED RADIATION HEATING

 

İ. DOYMAZ

Department of Chemical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34220 Esenler, Istanbul, TURKEY.

doymaz@yildiz.edu.tr

 

Cite this article as: 

Doymaz, I. (2022) “Drying, colour and rehydration characteristics of orange slices under infrared radiation heating”, Latin American Applied Research 52(1), pp 43-48.

 


Abstract-- The effect of different infrared (IR) powers on drying of orange slices was investigated in infrared dryer. The orange slices dried at 62, 74 and 88 W infrared powers and constant slice thickness of 6 mm. Results showed that drying, colour and rehydration characteristics of orange slices were greatly influenced by infrared power. The drying data were fitted with five mathematical models available in the literature. Based on the statistical tests applied to make an assessment, the model of Midilli and Kucuk was found to satisfactorily explain drying kinetics of orange slices for all drying conditions. The Fick’s diffusion model was used to calculate the effective moisture diffusivity (Deff) of orange slices. The values of Deff varied from 1.59×10-10 to 2.49×10-10 m2/s. It was found that the Deff increased with increasing IR power. Activation energy was estimated by a modified Arrhenius type equation as 2.11 kW/kg. As the infrared power increased, the rehydration ratio was found to be reduced. Furthermore, with increase of infrared power, the values of a and DE increased, whereas the values of L, b and C decreased.

Keywords-- Activation energy; effective moisture diffusivity; infrared drying; modelling; orange slices.

I. INTRODUCTION

Orange (Citrus sinensin L.), one of the most important fruit among citrus fruits, is consumed mostly as fresh or juice because of the its high level of vitamin C content and polyphenol contents like the other citrus fruits (Bozkir, 2020; Acoglu and Yolci Omeroglu, 2021). The worldwide production of oranges in 2019 was approximately 78699604 tons. The leading countries in orange production in the world are Brazil, China, India, United States of America, Mexico, Spain and Egypt, respectively. Orange production in Turkey was about 1700000 tons in 2019 (FAO, 2020).

High moisture content of orange leads to biochemical and microbial spoilage. Therefore, it is processed into frozen, dried, canned, jam and fruit juice forms in order to increase its shelf life (Ozkan-Karabacak et al., 2020). Drying, which is one of the oldest method for preserving food, can be applied under optimum conditions to extend the shelf life of the citrus by decreasing the moisture content to a low level to inactivate physiological, enzymatic and microbial degradation, as well lower the weight and transportation cost of products (Deng et al., 2020). Drying of orange is a common way to produce healthy snack foods, additives and confectionery and bakery products, powdered forms for beverages and fortification materials as a valuable bioactive source (Acoglu and Yolci Omeroglu, 2021).

There are many methods in the literature for drying food products. One of them is infrared drying method. Infrared drying has many more advantages over traditional drying methods, such as high energy efficiency and short drying times. This advantages are is due to quick absorption of energy by water molecules, which causes rapid evaporation of water and results in high drying rates of food and, thus, leads to a decrease of drying time and, therefore, to lower energy consumption and better quality of the dried food (Doymaz, 2015).

Several researches have studied the drying of orange slices, peels and skins such as convective (Garau et al., 2006; Rafiee et al., 2010; Deng et al., 2020), microwave + hot air drying (Diaz et al., 2003; de Pilli et al., 2008; Acoglu and Yolci Omeroglu, 2021), and vacuum drying (Ozkan-Karabacak et al., 2020). However, no study on infrared drying of orange has been reported in literature. The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of infrared power on drying, rehydration and colour characteristics, and compute effective moisture diffusivity and activation energy of orange slices.

II. MATERIAL AND METHODS
A. Material

The orange fruits (Citrus sinensin var. Washington) were purchased from a local market in Istanbul and immediately brought to the laboratory where the experiments would take place. Then, the oranges were washed thoroughly to remove dust and other foreign materials.  Prior to the drying experiment, the orange fruits were cut into 6±0.3 mm thick slices with peel using a sharp knife. The initial moisture content of oranges was determined by using an oven at 105°C for 24 h. Triplicate samples were used for the determination of moisture content and the average values were reported as 85.21%, w.b. (5.43 kg water/kg dry matter, d.b.).

B. Experimental procedure

Drying experiments were carried out in a moisture analyzer with one 250 W halogen lamp (Snijders Moisture Balance, Snijders b.v., Tilburg, Holland). Before infrared drying process, orange slices (approximately 45±0.5 g) were separated evenly and homogeneously over the pan. The drying experiments were performed at infrared power level varying from 62 to 88 W, determined with a digital energy meter (PeakTech 9035, Germany). The infrared power was set in control unit of equipment. Weight loss of samples was recorded at regular intervals of 15 min during drying using a digital balance (model BB3000, Mettler-Toledo AG, Grefensee, Switzerland), which has 0-3000 g measurement range with reading accuracy of 0.1 g. Drying was stopped when the moisture content of samples were approximately 14.9%, w.b. (0.175 kg water /kg dry matter, d.b.). The dried product was cooled and packaged in low-density polyethylene bags then heat-sealed. All experiments were carried out in triplicate. Drying data were analysed using two-way analysis of variance at p<0.05.

C. Moisture content

The moisture content of orange slices was calculated by the following equation:

,                          (1)

where  is the moisture content (kg water/kg dry matter),  is the weight of sample (kg), and  is the dry matter content of sample (kg).

D. Drying rate

The drying rate of orange slices at a particular time period was calculated as follows:

,                      (2)

where  is drying rate [kg water/(kg dry matter´min)],  and  are drying times (min), and  and  are the moisture contents (d.b.) at times  and , respectively.

E. Modelling

The moisture ratio () of orange slices was calculated from Eq. (3).

,                        (3)

where ,  and  are the moisture content at initial, equilibrium and at any time ‘’ (min) during drying process, respectively, expressed as kg water/kg dry matter). However, the equilibrium moisture content () is relatively small compared with  and , especially for infrared drying. So, Eq. (1)  can be simplified to  (Izli et al., 2021).

F. Data analysis

The  data from drying of orange slices was fitted with five thin-layer drying models (Table 1) typically used for the modeling of drying curves.

The data of  were analyzed using Statistica 8.0.550 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA) software packa-ge. The parameters of models were estimated using a non-linear regression procedure based on the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The fitting quality of the experimental data to all models was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), reduced chi-square (c2) and root mean square error (RMSE). Higher values of R2 and lower c2 and RMSE indicate better goodness of fit (Salehi and Satorabi, 2021). These parameters were calculated from the following formulas:

,                                        (4)

, (5)

.                      (6)

 

Table 1. Mathematical models applied to the drying curves.

Model name

Model 1)

Lewis

 

Henderson and Pabis

 

Logarithmic

Page

Midilli and Kucuk

1) a, b, c,  k and n: constants  and coefficients in drying models

where  and  are experimental and predicted dimensionless moisture ratios, respectively,  is number of observations, and  is number of constants.

G. Calculation of effective moisture diffusivity

Fick’s second law of diffusion equation, symbolized as a mass-diffusion equation for drying of agricultural products drying in a falling rate period, is shown in the following equation:

                    (7)

Fick’s second law of unsteady state diffusion given in Eq. (7) can be used to determine the moisture ratio in Eq. (8). The solution of diffusion equation for infinite slab given by Crank (1975), and supposed uniform initial moisture distribution, negligible external resistance, constant diffusivity and negligible shrinkage, is:

      (8)

where  is the effective moisture diffusivity (m2/s),  is the time (s),  is the half-thickness of samples (m) and  is a positive integer. Eq. (8) can be simplified to the following for long drying times.

. (9)

The Eq. (9) can be linearized by applying natural logarithmic at both sides as shown in Eq. (10), where the slope of the graph ( versus time) was used to determine the

,                                    (10)

.                  (11)

H. Estimation of activation energy

Activation energy () represents the minimum energy required for water molecules to migrate within the food during drying (Martynenko and Kudra, 2016). For the calculation of activation energy, modified form of Arrhenius equation shows the relationship between the effective moisture diffusivity and the infrared power to sample weight (Kayran and Doymaz, 2019).

,   (12)

where  is the pre-exponential factor of Arrhenius equation (m2/s),  is the activation energy (W/kg),  is the infrared power level (W), and  is the sample weight (kg).

I. Colour

The colour parameters of fresh and dried orange slices were determined using a Konica Minolta CR-400 (Tokyo, Japan) chroma meter equipped with a D65 illuminant and operating with CIE Lab [L (whiteness/darkness), a (redness/greenness), and b (yellowness/blueness)] colour spaces. Calibration was performed with the colour calibration tile before the colour measurements. Four separate measurements were randomly taken from the surface of the orange slices, and the results were given as the average of four separate measurements. The total colour differences (DE) and Chroma (C) calculated using Eqs. (13) and (14), respectively (Isik et al., 2019; Kayran and Doymaz, 2019):

,                     (13)

,                     (14)

where ,  and  are the colour values of fresh samples before drying.

J. Rehydration

Two grams of dried orange slices were soaked in 300 mL of distilled water at 20°C. After 6 h, the samples were removed from water, wiped with tissue paper, then drained and weighed. The rehydration was expressed by moisture content of the orange slices during rehydration process. Rehydration ratio () of the orange slices was calculated as follow (Kutlu, 2021):

                              (15)

where  is weight of rehydrated samples (g) and  is weight dried samples (g). The experiments were replicated three times and the average values were calculated.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A. Drying curves

The effect of infrared power on drying curves of the orange slices during drying is shown in Fig. 1. The drying curves are typical to ones for similar fruits and vegetables. The moisture content decreased exponentially with elapsed duration of drying and decreased faster at higher infrared powers in all cases, as expected. As can be seen, an increase in the infrared power decreased the moisture content due to increasing temperature. The drying time required reaching the final moisture content of samples were 315, 240 and 210 min at the infrared power levels of 62, 74 and 88 W, respectively. The average drying rate of samples increased 1.5 times as infrared power increased from 62 W to 88 W. As expected at higher infrared power level the higher heat absorption resulted in higher product temperature, higher mass transfer driving force, faster drying rate and consequently shorter drying time. Similar studies have been previously reported by some researchers (Corrêa et al., 2012; Darvishi et al., 2014; Kayran and Doymaz, 2019).

B. Drying rate

The drying rate curves of orange slices are shown in Fig. 2. Figure 2 reveals that, in general, two distinct periods are identifiable, namely warming-up and falling-rate periods. The initial short warming-up stage corresponds to sample heating, and consequently to non-isothermal drying conditions this followed by a falling-rate period. A constant-rate period could not be detected in drying rate curves in Fig. 2. Similar results have been observed in the drying of lemon slices (Darvishi et al., 2014) and orange peels (Deng et al., 2020). As shown in Fig. 2, the higher

 

Fig. 1. Variations of moisture content with drying time of orange slices at different infrared powers.

Fig. 2. Variations of drying rate as a function of drying time for different infrared powers.

the infrared power, the greater the increase in drying rates. The drying rates were higher in the beginning of the process, and thereafter decreased with decrease of moisture content in the samples during drying process. The results were consistent with observations made by different authors on drying various agricultural products (Hafezi et al., 2015; Doymaz, 2015).

C. Evaluation of the models

The moisture content data obtained in the 6 mm thick orange slices were converted into the moisture ratio (MR) and fitted to the five thin-layer drying models listed in the Table 1. The model having the highest R2 and the lowest c2 and RMSE values was determined as the best. The results obtained by statistical calculation are given in Table 2.

Among the different models examined, Midilli and Kucuk model could be considered as the most suitable drying model with the highest R2 and lowest c2 and RMSE

Table 2. Thin-layer drying model constants and statistical parameters of orange slices

Fig. 3. Comparison of experimental moisture ratio with predicted moisture ratio from the Midilli and Kucuk  model for orange slices.

 

values for all drying experiments (Table 2). The R2, c2, and RMSE values of this model varied within the ranges of 0.9993-0.9995, 0.000047-0.000083, and 0.019952-0.024625, respectively. To validate the selected model, plots of experimental MR and predicted MR by Midilli and Kucuk model are shown in Fig. 3.

A good agreement was observed between experimental and predicted MR values. That is, the data points generally banded around a 45° straight line on the plots. This trend provides extra evidence for the suitability of the model to forecast the drying characteristics of orange slices. Similar results were reported by Darvishi et al. (2014) and Maftoonazad et al. (2020).

D. Effective moisture diffusivity

The effective moisture diffusivity (Deff) values for different infrared power levels, calculated from Eq. (11), are given in Fig. 4 and ranged from 1.59×10-10 to 2.49×10-10 m2/s and were within the range of moisture diffusion values of food ingredients (10-12 to 10-8 m2/s) (Zogzas et al., 1996).

The Deff values increased with increase in infrared power due to high mass transfer at high temperatures. Drying at 88 W had the highest value of effective mois-

Fig. 4. Variation of effective moisture diffusivity with infrared powers.

Fig. 5. Arrhenius-type relationship between effective moisture diffusivity and infrared power.

 

ture diffusivity and the lowest value was obtained for 62 W. The Deff values of orange slices was reported as 6.27´10-10 to 3.5´10-10 m2/s in temperature range of 40 to 80°C by Rafiee et al. (2010). Garau et al. (2006) determined that the Deff values changed between 0.81´10-10 to 5.11´10-10 m2/s in temperature range of 30 to 90°C as a result of drying the orange skins. The Deff values obtained from the studies mentioned above seem to agree with the values obtained in this study. The relationship between effective moisture diffusivity and infrared power can be represented as:

(16)

E. Activation energy

The activation energy can be determined from the slope of Arrhenius plot, ln(Deff) versus  (Eq. 12). The ln (Deff) as a function of the sample weight/infrared power level was plotted in Fig. 5. The slope of the line is (-Ea) and the intercept equals to ln (D0).

The results show a linear relationship due to Arrhenius type dependence. Equation (17) shows the effect of sample weight/power level on Deff of samples with the following coefficients: 

 

Table 3. Results of colour values for dried orange slices.

IR power

 (W)

L

a

b

C

DE

62

48.37±1.29

6.48±0.08

19.21±0.62

20.27±0.56

38.24±0.47

74

46.91±1.08

7.23±0.06

17.88±0.55

19.28±0.48

39.56±0.52

88

59.85±1.35

7.81±0.09

8.59+0.19

11.60±0.22

49.80±0.60

Fig. 6. Values of rehydration ratio of the orange slices dried at different infrared powers.

(17)

The calculated values of D0 and Ea from modified Arrhenius type exponential Eq. (17) were 8.14×10-10 m2/s and 2.11 kW/kg, respectively.

F. Colour 

Colour is very important characteristic which influences the consumer acceptability. The colour values of fresh orange slices were measured as L, a, and b equal to 49.39, 3.28, and 36.46, respectively. Table 3 represents L, a, b, ΔE, and C values of dried orange slices.

As shown in Table 3, the results obtained from colour measurements of orange slices dried under various conditions showed that the infrared radiation power has a significant effect on the colour of the orange slices. After all drying processes, the dried samples had lower L and b values and higher a values. If the colour values of the fresh and dried samples are compared, a decrease in the L and b values of the dried samples, whereas an increase in the a values was observed.  According to the results presented in Table 3, L values varied between 20.27 and 11.60 depending on the infrared power level. It has been stated that the variation in whiteness of dried samples can be taken as a measurement of browning. Under the same conditions, the b values fell from 19.21 to 8.59. In contrast, a values increased from 6.48 to 7.81.  Infrared drying produced an increase in a value compared to fresh orange, probably due to isomerization or the increase in the concentration of some types of red carotenoids as lycopene (which has an intensely red tonality) because of heat irradiated and reduction of moisture content. Similar opinion has been expressed by Vega-Galvez et al. (2021) before.

The values of DE, which expresses the total colour change of orange slices after drying process. With increasing in infrared power from 62 to 88 W, ΔE was increased from 38.24 to 49.80. This is attributed to the process of Maillard browning reaction that might have occurred drying process. Alaei and Chayjan (2015) reported that the increase in the DE values of dried nectarine due to the increasing temperature of the vacuum-infrared dryer from 50 to 70°C. The chroma values were decreased 20.27 to 11.60 when infrared power increased from 62 to 88 W, and showed a decrease during drying process. The obtained values for chroma show the saturation degree of colour and are corresponding to the colour strength (Aidani et al., 2017).

G. Rehydration ratio

Rehydration can be defined as a measurement of food material damages during drying and pre-treatments. The amount and rate of water absorption is important points that affect the sensorial properties and preparation time during reconstitution of dried products (Mahtoonazad et al., 2020).  To investigate the effect of drying conditions on final product quality, the values rehydration ratio of dried orange slices were calculated by using Eq. (15) and shown in Fig. 6.

As the infrared power increased, the rehydration ratio was found to be reduced. Thus in order to produce dried products with desirable rehydration ratio, very high infrared power during drying process should be avoided. Similar results were also presented in apple slices (Taiwo et al., 2002), carrot slices (Doymaz, 2015) and pear (Antal et al., 2017).

IV. CONCLUSIONS

Drying characteristics of orange slices were investigated in an infrared dryer at different infrared powers. The drying, colour and rehydration were significantly influenced by infrared power. The drying time decreased with the increase in infrared power. The entire drying process occurred in the falling-rate period and constant-rate period was not observed. The Midilli and Kucuk model described the best fit of the experimental data with higher R2 value and lowest c2 and RMSE values. The values of effective moisture diffusivity were varied between 1.59×10-10 and 2.49×10-10 m2/s for the range of infrared powers studies, between 62 W and 88 W. With the increase of power level, the effective moisture diffusivity increased. Activation energy was estimated by a modified Arrhenius type equation as 2.11 kW/kg. The values of colour parameters, a and DE increased, and L, b and C decreased with increasing infrared power during drying process.

REFERENCES

Acoglu, B. and Yolci Omeroglu, P. (2021) The effect of drying processes on pesticide residues in orange (Citrus sinensis). Dry. Technol.  39, 2039-2054.

Aidani, E., Hadadkhodaparast, M. and Kashaninejad, M. (2017) Experimental and modeling investigation of mass transfer during combined infrared-vacuum drying of Hayward kiwifruits. Food Sci. Nutr. 5, 596–601.

Alaei, B. and Chayjan, R.A. (2015). Modeling of nectarine drying under near infrared - vacuum conditions. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 14, 15–27.

Antal, T., Tarek-Tilistyák, J., Cziáky, Z. and Sinka, L. (2017) Comparison of drying and quality characteristics of pear (Pyrus communis L.) using mid-infrared-freeze drying and single stage of freeze drying. Int. J. Food Eng. 2017, 20160294.

Bozkir, H. (2020). Effects of hot air, vacuum infrared and vacuum microwave dryers on the drying kinetics and quality characteristics of orange slices. J. Food Process Eng. 43, e13485.

Corrêa, P.C., de Oliveira, G.H.H., Baptestini, F.M., Diniz, M.D.M.S. and da Paixão, A.A. (2012) Tomato infrared drying: Modeling and some coefficients of the dehydration Process. Chilean J. Agric. Res. 72, 262-267.

Crank, J. (1975) Diffusion in a plane sheet. The Mathematics of Diffusion. Oxford University Press, London, UK, 43-61.

Darvishi, H., Khoshtaghaza, M.H. and Minaei, S. (2014) Drying kinetics and colour change of lemon slices. Int. Agrophys. 28, 1-6.

de Pilli, T., Lovino, R., Maenza, S., Derossi, A. and Severini, C. (2008) Study on operating conditions of orange drying processıng: Comparıson between conventional and combined treatment. J. Food Proces. Preserva. 32, 751–769.

Deng, L.Z, Mujumdar, A.S., Yang, W.X., Zhang, Q., Zheng, Z.A., Wu, M. and Xiao, H.W. (2020) Hot air impingement drying kinetics and quality attributes of orange peel. J. Food Proces. Preserva. 44, e14294.

Diaz, G.R., Martinez -Monzo, J., Fito, P. and Chiralt, A. (2003) Modelling of dehydration-rehydration of orange slices in combined microwave / air drying. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 4, 203-209.

Doymaz, I. (2015) Infrared drying kinetics and quality characteristics of carrot slices. J. Food Proces. Preserva. 39, 2738-2745.

FAO, Food and Agricultural Organization Statistica Database (2020) Available at: http://faostat3.fao.org/ download/Q/QC/E. Accessed December 22, 2020.

Garau, M.C., Simal, S., Femenia, A. and Rossello, C. (2006) Drying of orange skin: drying kinetics modelling and functional properties. J. Food Eng. 75, 288–295.

Hafezi, N., Sheikhdavoodi, M.J. and Sajadiye, S.M. (2015) Evaluation of quality characteristics of potato slices during drying by infrared radiation heating method under vacuum. Int. J. Agric. Food Res. 4, 1-8.

Isik, A., Ozdemir, M. and Doymaz, I. (2019) Infrared drying of bee pollen: Effects and impacts on food componets. Czech J. Food Sci. 37, 69-74.

Izli, G., Taskin, O. and Izli, N. (2021) Convective, microwave and Combined microwave-convective drying of pepino. Erwerbs-Obstbau. 63, 175–184.

Kayran, S. and Doymaz, I. (2019) Infrared drying of apricot pomace. Lat. Am. Appl. Res. 45, 213-218.

Kutlu, N. (2021). Optimization of ohmic heating-assisted osmotic dehydration as a pretreatment for microwave drying of quince. Food Sci. Technol. Int., doi: 10.1177/1082013221991613

Maftoonazad, N., Dehghani, M.R. and Ramaswamy, H.S. (2020) Hybrid microwave-hot air tunnel drying of onion slices: Drying kinetics, energy efficiency, product rehydration, colour, and flavor characteristics. Dry. Technol. doi: 10.1080/07373937. 2020.1841790

Martynenko, A. and Kudra, T. (2016) Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) drying of grape pomace. Japan J. Food Eng. 17, 123-129.

Ozkan-Karabacak, A., Acoglu, B., Yolci Omeroglu, P. and Copur, O.U. (2020) Microwave pre-treatment for vacuum drying of orange slices: Drying characteristics, rehydration capacity and quality properties. J. Food Process Eng. 43, e13511.

Rafiee, S., Sharifi, M., Keyhani, A., Omid, M., Jafari, A., Mohtasebi, S.S. and Mobli, H. (2010) Modeling effective moisture diffusivity of orange slice (Thompson Cv.). Int. J. Food Prop. 13, 32-40.

Salehi, F. and Satorabi, M. (2021) Infrared drying kinetics of coated peach slices with basil seed and xhantan gums. Lat. Am. Appl. Res. 51, 171-178.

Taiwo, K.A., Angersbach, A. and Knorr, D. (2002) Influence of high intensity electric field pulses and osmotic dehydration on the rehydration characteristics of apple slices at different temperatures. J. Food Eng. 52, 185-192.

VegaGalvez, A., Uribe, E., Poblete, J., García, V., Pastén, A., Aguilera, L.E. and Stucken, K. (2021) Comparative Study of dehydrated papaya (Vasconcellea pubescens) by different drying methods: Quality attributes and effects on cells viability. J. Food Meas. Charact. 15, 2524-2550.

Zogzas, N.P., Maroulis, Z.B. and Marinos-Kouris, D. (1996). Moisture diffusivity data compilation in foodstuffs. Dry. Technol. 14, 2225-2253.

 

Received: July 9 2021

Sent to Subject Editor: August 2, 2021

Accepted: September 23, 2021

Recommended by Subject Editor Jose Luis Diaz de Tuesta